REPORT
April 2022
The Politics of Protein
Examining claims about livestock, fish, ‘alternative proteins’ & sustainability
This page is automatically translated from the English original using DeepL and may contain errors.
This major report by IPES-Food sheds light on misleading generalisations that dominate public discussion about meat and protein, and warns of the risks of falling for meat techno-fixes.
Meat and protein are firmly in the spotlight of debates around food systems, climate change, and nutrition. Big meat, dairy, and seafood companies are fast rolling out a range of technologies – such as plant-based alternatives, lab-grown meat, and precision livestock and fish-farming – with the backing of governments worldwide.
But IPES-Food warns that a number of misleading claims dominate public discussion about meat and protein, leading to:
- A disproportionate focus on ‘protein’.
- Systematic failures to account for differences between production systems and world regions, and all facets of sustainability.
- Simplistic silver bullet solutions based on flawed ‘facts’.
It recommends:
- Focusing on a transition to sustainable food systems (not just a ‘protein transition’);
- Prioritizing reforms that deliver on all aspects of sustainability;
- Reclaiming public resources from Big Protein, and resetting the debate.
It’s easy to see why people would be drawn to the marketing and hype, but meat techno-fixes will not save the planet. In many cases, they will make the problems with our industrial food system worse – fossil fuel dependence, industrial monocultures, pollution, poor work conditions, unhealthy diets, and control by massive corporations. Just as electric cars are not a silver bullet to fix climate change, these solutions are not going to fix our damaging industrial food system. We need to change the system – not the product.
Phil Howard, lead author of the report








